
Poland Loses €320M Due to Judicial Reform Dispute
By Lawyer Monthly
Published
2 min read
The court's decision, delivered on Wednesday, reinforced the European Commission's stance, stating, "In recovering the amounts payable, the Commission did not infringe EU law."
Poland will not receive back the €320 million in EU funds that were deducted due to ongoing disputes with Brussels regarding judicial reforms and the country's adherence to the rule of law. The General Court has ruled that the European Commission acted correctly by withholding the funds in response to Poland’s controversial judicial reforms, which have been a point of contention between Warsaw and the EU for years.
The court's decision, delivered on Wednesday, reinforced the European Commission's stance, stating, "In recovering the amounts payable, the Commission did not infringe EU law."
The dispute traces back to the nationalist Law and Justice (PiS) government’s 2015 judicial reforms, which the European Commission deemed violated the independence of Poland’s judiciary. The issue specifically revolved around the disciplinary chamber of the Polish Supreme Court, which was given powers to penalize judges based on their rulings, potentially undermining the separation of powers.
In response, the European Court of Justice imposed daily fines of €1 million, later reduced to €500,000, due to Poland’s failure to comply with an interim order to suspend the reform. These fines were imposed until 2023, after the European Court declared the judicial reform incompatible with the right to an independent judiciary.
To recover the fines, the European Commission activated its "offset mechanism," which allowed it to deduct the fines from Poland's EU budget allocation. Despite Poland’s argument that new legal concessions made in 2022 warranted a break, the General Court ruled against Poland, affirming the Commission's authority. "Inasmuch as Poland had not fully complied with its obligations, the Commission was obliged to ensure recovery of that amount in full," the judges concluded.
The Polish government under Prime Minister Donald Tusk, who took office in 2023, still has the option to appeal the ruling. Tusk has worked to reverse the judicial reforms introduced by PiS and played a critical role in securing the release of €137 billion in EU funds that were previously frozen due to these reforms.
Michael McGrath, the European Commissioner for Democracy, Justice, and the Rule of Law, emphasized the importance of consistency in applying rule-of-law principles across EU member states. He stated, “What is important is that the European Union acts in a consistent manner with all member states when it comes to rule-of-law issues, that we ourselves follow due process.” He added, “Compliance with the rule of law is not à la carte, it is not an option extra. It is a fundamental part of European Union membership.”
The ongoing struggle between Poland and the European Union over judicial independence began several years ago and has become one of the most prominent and contentious issues in the relationship between Poland and Brussels. The roots of this conflict trace back to 2015 when the right-wing nationalist Law and Justice (PiS) party, led by Jarosław Kaczyński, came to power in Poland. The PiS government initiated a series of reforms that it argued would overhaul Poland's judiciary system to make it more efficient and accountable. However, critics, including the European Union, viewed these reforms as a threat to judicial independence and the rule of law.




