
Declaration of 4 vacant seats: Bagbin's ruling a bad precedent-Kwaku Azar
By DL News
Published
2 min read
In his view, this ruling could set a troubling precedent that might discourage Members of Parliament (MPs) from considering their future political careers out of fear of punitive consequences.
Professor Stephen Kwaku Asare, also known as Kwaku Azar, has expressed concerns regarding Speaker of Parliament Alban Bagbin's recent decision to declare four parliamentary seats vacant.
In his view, this ruling could set a troubling precedent that might discourage Members of Parliament (MPs) from considering their future political careers out of fear of punitive consequences.
In a Facebook post dated Thursday, October 17, Kwaku Azar warned that such a decision could potentially upset the political balance that voters have established. He emphasized that it could create an environment where MPs feel constrained in pursuing their political aspirations, limiting their independence in Parliament.
Kwaku Azar further highlighted that this ruling could have significant implications for Ghana’s parliamentary system and democratic governance. He cautioned that if such actions become commonplace, it could deter MPs from exploring independent or diverse political paths, ultimately reducing the range of perspectives in the legislature.
His concerns echo broader worries about how the Speaker’s decision could impact the long-term autonomy of MPs and their freedom to associate with different political parties.
Kwaku Azar believes this ruling risks disrupting the natural political balance and undermining democratic processes that allow MPs to represent their constituents freely. He urged caution in making such rulings in the future, warning of a potential chilling effect on MPs' willingness to engage in political planning.
“This ruling establishes a dangerous precedent, threatening MPs' ability to plan their political futures without the fear of immediate repercussions,” he said in his post. He added that decisions like these could be misinterpreted as shifts in allegiance, destabilizing Parliament and prematurely vacating seats, which would undermine voter-established balances and the principle that MPs should serve their full term unless there is a clear change in allegiance.
Furthermore, Professor Kwaku Azar argued that Speaker Bagbin’s decision contradicts the fundamental right to freedom of association, as it penalizes MPs for pursuing future political affiliations. He noted, "This ruling unfairly treats the mere act of nomination for a future election as a severance of current loyalty, penalizing MPs and discouraging their political development."
In summary, Kwaku Azar called for a more measured approach to such decisions, warning of the potential negative consequences for Ghana’s parliamentary democracy.




