No legal basis for prima facie against Chief Justice — Former Deputy AG Diana Dapaah asserts

Former Deputy Attorney General and Minister for Justice Diana Asonaba Dapaah has criticized Chief Justice Gertrude Torkornoo's suspension, arguing that there is no legal justification for finding a prima facie case against her.

Appearing on Newsfile on Saturday, Ms. Dapaah stated that after carefully examining the three petitions submitted to President John Mahama for the Chief Justice’s removal, she found them lacking merit.

Her remarks come amid widespread debate following the Chief Justice’s suspension, a move made by President Mahama reportedly on the advice of the Council of State. The decision has provoked intense scrutiny, with questions being raised about its legality, transparency, and adherence to constitutional procedures.

Ms. Dapaah explained that although Article 146 of the 1992 Constitution grants the President discretion to suspend the Chief Justice, the process must align with broader constitutional principles, which she believes were not fully respected.

The petitions accuse Justice Torkornoo of misconduct and abuse of office, though critics, including Ms. Dapaah, argue that the allegations lack specificity and appear politically charged.

She emphasized the critical need for strict adherence to due process when dealing with high-ranking judicial officials to preserve public confidence in the judiciary.

As national attention remains fixed on the unfolding events, a five-member committee appointed by the Presidency has been tasked with investigating the allegations — a process many hope will bring clarity to the contentious suspension.