Van Vicker sues Lil Win for GH¢10 million over alleged defamatory video

Ghanaian actor and film producer Van Vicker has commenced legal action against fellow actor Kwadwo Nkansah, popularly known as Lil Win, at the High Court in Accra, seeking GH¢10 million in exemplary damages over comments allegedly made about him in a video circulated on social media.

The suit, initiated by a writ of summons and statement of claim dated October 10, 2026, centres on allegations that Lil Win made statements which questioned Van Vicker's honesty and professionalism and negatively affected his standing in Ghana's film industry.

According to the court documents, the dispute arose from a video published on TikTok and Facebook on August 13, 2026, bearing the headline, "LIL WIN BANS VAN VICKER FROM ACTING IN KUMASI!"

Van Vicker contends that the statements contained in the publication were defamatory and exposed him to public embarrassment, ridicule and contempt.

He maintains that the publication has damaged the professional reputation he has built over the years as an actor, producer and director.

Allegations contained in the video

In his statement of claim, Van Vicker reproduces portions of the video, which was delivered in Twi, together with their English translations.

Among the statements attributed to Lil Win is an allegation that Van Vicker had been dishonest in his dealings with him.

"Our own brother, Van Vicker has lied again against me," the defendant is alleged to have stated.

The publication also reportedly questioned Van Vicker's commitment to a film production, accusing him of failing to respond to calls and neglecting responsibilities connected with the project.

Another portion of the video cited in the court documents reads:

"You did not try at all. That is PM and Director. Ask them. You failed to do the work."

The plaintiff further alleges that Lil Win threatened to exclude him from an upcoming film titled Journey to Africa if certain concerns were not addressed.

Van Vicker argues that the statements, taken together, created the impression that he was dishonest, unreliable and unwilling to honour his professional commitments.

He also claims that the publication suggested he had been prohibited from participating in film productions in Kumasi.

Actor claims publication has affected his career

Beyond the alleged damage to his reputation, Van Vicker says the controversy has had consequences for his professional engagements.

According to the statement of claim, several actors, producers and film directors contacted him following the circulation of the video to seek clarification about the allegations.

He contends that the publication created uncertainty among industry players regarding his availability to participate in film productions in Kumasi.

The actor further alleges that some producers who previously engaged his services have become reluctant to offer him roles as a result of the controversy.

He maintains that he has lost acting opportunities and has had to cancel planned business trips to Kumasi because of concerns arising from the alleged threats and public reaction.

In paragraph 22 of the statement of claim, Van Vicker asserts that the publication has seriously injured his reputation and exposed him to public scandal, contempt and ridicule.

He denies the allegations attributed to Lil Win and insists that he has consistently conducted his professional activities with integrity.

GH¢10 million in damages and public apology

As part of the reliefs sought, Van Vicker is asking the High Court to declare the statements complained of defamatory and libellous.

He is also seeking GH¢10 million in exemplary damages, in addition to general damages for the alleged injury to his reputation.

The actor further wants the court to order Lil Win to retract the statements and issue a public apology.

According to the statement of claim, the proposed retraction and apology should appear on news portals with the same prominence as the original publication for four consecutive weeks.

He is additionally seeking an award of legal costs.

The action was filed on his behalf by lawyer Ebenezer Asare of Troth Legal, based in West Legon, Accra.

Lil Win required to respond to suit

The writ of summons requires Lil Win to enter an appearance within eight days of being served, including the day of service.

Failure to comply with the directive could expose him to judgment in default of appearance, subject to the applicable rules of court.

The filing of the action does not establish that the statements were defamatory or that Lil Win is liable for the alleged damage.

Those issues remain for the High Court to determine after considering the evidence and the respective cases of the parties.

The action brings a dispute between two prominent figures in Ghana's entertainment industry before the courts, with Van Vicker seeking financial compensation and a public retraction of the statements he considers harmful to his reputation.